The Problem: Looming concerns over loan debt and the return on investment of a four-year degree have many students reconsidering applying to private colleges. Middle-class families are particularly affected: on paper, they might earn too much to qualify for need-based financial aid like the federal Pell grant, but affording the ‘expected family contribution’ is another story.
The Solution: To bridge this gap, a growing number of private institutions are offering free or reduced tuition to middle-class students; income threshold requirements vary by school. The concept is not entirely new, but the positioning is. Many schools have bestowed a branded name on these programs and launched public relations and marketing efforts centered around a message of affordability.
Other schools have retooled policies to increase support for middle-class students. For example, some no longer factor home equity of a family’s primary residence into a student’s financial aid eligibility assessment.
Exhibit A: Pennsylvania-based Franklin & Marshall College launched the Commonwealth Commitment in Fall 2025. The program allows state residents with annual household income below $75,000 to attend F&M tuition-free, while those earning $75,001 to $150,000 pay no more than in-state tuition at Penn State University. “The goal is to provide families with upfront, concrete clarity about the cost of an F&M education,” says Vice President of Enrollment Management M. Leslie Davidson. “When students know that F&M is affordable before they apply, they can make decisions based on fit rather than cost.”
In its first recruitment cycle since announcing the program, F&M has seen growth in applications from eligible students and has admitted 25% more students from middle-class families than in previous years.
The Pros: Communicating affordability is key to reaching students who may not otherwise apply. Says Davidson: “Many families assume private colleges are out of reach, but for many students…[it] costs less than public universities.” Growing the applicant pool is another benefit. “Increasing applications from talented students of all financial backgrounds improves the academic caliber of the student body and enhances the educational experience for all,” she says.
Get Higher Ground in your inbox each week!
The must-read newsletter for leaders shaping higher education’s future.
By clicking “Sign Up”, you will receive the latest updates, including emails, from U.S. News & World Report and our trusted partners and sponsors, and you agree to our Terms and Conditions & Privacy Policy.
The Cons: Money for institutional grants and scholarships must come from somewhere. The sustainability of these programs depends on adequate funding, whether with donor-funded support or subsidized by tuition revenue from high-income students. And these new programs must balance with existing internal financial aid commitments for lower-income students.
Reality Check: These programs are often a matter of messaging. At its core, the free-tuition model is a recruitment effort. Even with more admitted middle-class students, typical efforts to boost yield are still vital to take them from application to matriculation.
The Upshot: Reconsidering income thresholds for need-based institutional aid puts a private college education within reach for middle-class students whose families do not qualify for federal financial assistance programs. This could boost applications (and, later, enrollment) from students who might assume an otherwise desirable school is out of their price range.
